The Horizon Project VCOP

Saturday, March 27, 2010

This blog has moved


This blog is now located at http://horizonvcop.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://horizonvcop.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.

Friday, July 15, 2005

Next Horizon VCOP Meeting Jul 27 noon EDT

Our next Horizon VCOP meeting will be a presentation on Wed Jul 27 at noon EDT. Details below:

Title: Avoiding Self-Delusion: New Technologies and Expectation Effects
Presenter: Ruben R. Puentedura, Ph.D., President, Hippasus

One fine day you come into your office, and find everyone singing the praises of a new technology for the classroom - or perhaps complaining bitterly about it. The question in your mind is, though, is it solely the technology's pedagogical merits that are causing these reactions, or are there other factors at work? For instance, could novelty and the expectations that surround it be causing the observed results? Join us as we discuss how expectation effects can confound the evaluation of new classroom practices, how to improve your evaluation methods so as to clear away this fog, and how to apply this methodology to the upcoming technologies discussed in the Horizon Report.

When: Wed Jul 27 noon EDT [For your time zone: http://tinyurl.com/8qpwy ]

Where: iCohere Horizon web space [ http://www.conferences.iCohere.com/horizon ] and phone conference. If you want to invite colleagues to come along and they aren't members, please do. They can use the guest login to Horizon [user id = Horizon, password = guest] and we can fix them up with a permanent login after the meeting.

Horizon VCOP Team
http://www.horizonvcop.org/

Monday, January 17, 2005

Mapping del.icio.us with Anthracite and OmniGraffle


Several people have asked me how I constructed the visualizations that I used in my talk on del.icio.us. My own approach involved a fair amount of hand-rolled custom code - not fun for people unaccustomed to writing their own software and working from the command line. So as to give non-programming-savvy researchers a chance to explore del.icio.us - or other online systems with implicit network structures - for themselves, I have put together a short guide on using two Mac OS X applications, Anthracite and OmniGraffle, for this purpose.


Comments and suggestions are welcome, either here or on my weblog.


Friday, January 14, 2005

A Moveable Feast: the del.icio.us web

For those of you interested in my talk on del.icio.us, I have now posted the slides and audio. If you've heard about del.icio.us, but aren't quite sure what the fuss is all about, or if you've already tried it out, but would like to know how to get the most out of it, this talk is for you.

Comments and suggestions are welcome, either here or on my weblog.

Saturday, October 23, 2004

Educause - Diana Oblinger Educating The Net Generation

These are quick notes from Diana's presentation.

Who are these learners? Meeting student expectations drives decisions on campus.

Net Gen - grown up in tech intensive environment (ref Prensky 2003)

So what? Neuroscience research - environment in which you live hard wires the brain differently (Prensky 2001)

So who are these kids?

Age 6 and under - (Kaiser Family Foundation 2003) as much time on computer as playing outside. Not just middle class families - access to computers shows differences are not as large as many people believe.

teenage years - grow up and use net as resource for lots of things - partic. using tech as a communication device, e.g. messenging, IMs - know more screen names than phone numbers.

What do kids want from the net? Mostly to get interesting things (80%), learn more/better (70%), community (60%), show others what I can do (20%), Be heard (20%) (Grunwald 2003). Used to market researchers asking want they want, creates expectation for being asked for education too.

Net generation (Millenials, GenY) - born in or after 82. Cool to be smart, like tech, gravitate toward group activity (Howard & Strauss, 2003). 5 key characteristics - Digitally literate (not nec experts though), Mobile, Always on (to social network), Experiential (poss coz grew up with games), Social (relate to people and stay connected to people).

Hypertext minds - qualities and concerns (Prensky 2001); crave interactivity read visual images, visual-spatial skills, parallel processing BUT concerns short attention spans choose not to pay attention, reflection (lack), practice, text literacy, source quality.

Learning preferences - teams, P2P, like structure, engagement & experience, visual & kinesthetic (Studies into taking same course content in diff ways), things that matter (socially responsible, believe sci&tech can improve society)

Informal learning (Sheppard 2000, Dede 2004) - can be self-taught, learning in free time, learners construct their own courses

Non-traditional learners - so not a uniform population (NCES, 2003) - 43% 24+, 80% employed, 39% employed full-time, 10% of UGs have disability

More ESL learners than ever before

More adult learners - ave age 38, tend to be a woman

Swirling - students transfer or enrolled in multiple institutions at the same time (partic with online learning)

Generational comparison - but how do we look at the world?

Ask yourself:
Cntrl+Alt+Del is as basic as ABC
Never been a le to find the return key
Remembering turned over to technology
Go to meetings with laptop or pda
Constantly connected


Characteristics of sts v s faculty
multitask vs single
pics, sounds video vs text
random access vs logical sequence
interactive & networked vs independent & individual
engaging vs disciplined
spontaneous vs deliberate

today's students are no loger the people are ed system was designed to teach Prensky 2001

IT'S NOT ABOUT TECHNOLOGY

Age vs online preferences (Dziuban, 2004) - sts who are very satisfied with web-based learning Net Gen lowest at 24%

What do you want in a learning environment? Roberts 2004

1. Faculty to have in depth understanding of discipline
2. Faculty to be able to use tech effectively - access o syllabus, course assignments (i.e. convenience and structure)
3. Don't overuse the tech - we don't want too much - meaning of powerpoint s to give power to a point not to do everything

In classroom environment (Kvavaik, 2004) - want mix of f2f and online

Multimedia literacy (Grunwald, 2004), text vs visual - see websites see NETHEADS ONLINE


How are we going to use the tech differently? MIT Augmented technology, simulations, environmental detectives f2f in real environment and online and GPS - they have a multimedia intelligence

We don't speak the same language (Prensky 2001)

Key concept of 1st person learning adapted deom Accenture 2000

lecture -> real object

Examples:
The Valley of the Shadow project http://valley.vcdh.virginai.edu
(US Civil War site) from beginnings as digital collection to much much more
Online labs - MIT microelectronics lab
Simulations - Ancient spaces (archeology) - building up research/constructing own knowledge

How Active Learning and technology can enable - students learn from thinking, thinking is engaged by activity

4th point - importance of interaction (experiential and social) - computer labs tend not to be highly interactive as a learning space, PRS + concept inventories (threshold concepts in discipline) immediate feedback keeps students engaged, allows real-time modification of instruction

interactive devices - e.g. magic paper on a tablet

Reconfiguring space, curriculum and activities

SCALE-UP Beicher & saul 2003 - class time spent on tangibles and ponderables - students in teams and tables - results 20-30% improvement. Collaborative/Active learning principles employed.

Students learn all the time in formal and informal spaces (so how do we construct the informal spaces that allow learning)

Spaces can be very enabling but we need diff spaces for diff purposes - need informal spaces. Students watch lecture videos at home but come to campus to do their homework with peers (e.g what if we had e-whiteboards in corridors and you could email the results to the informal group?)

Principles to remember -

It is not technology alone
Interactivity
Knowledge construction
Formal & Informal
Adaptation - John Seely Brown calls them the remix generation/culture

How can we bring all these principles to gether to create appropriate and varied learning spaces

4 question we may want to ask

1. How well do we really understand our students?
2. How interactive are our learning environments/spaces?
3. Do we have an infrastructure for pervasive learning?
4. What types of spaces (onground and online) lead to greater learning? to greater community? How do/will we know?

Take time to create the future rather than defend the past.